Norlys Kystlinjen
Public web edition · FY2026

Caring for the coast, ferrying the nation.

For 1180 people and 34 routes, the sea is both road and employer. This is the first half-year report of a fleet in transition — from diesel toward the grid.

06:15 Bergen→Haukeland 07:40 Oslo→Fjorden 08:05 Ålesund→Vørey 09:30 Bodø→Vesterålen
Interactive route map of the Norlys Kystlinjen networkStylised Norwegian coastline with 34 ferry routes between coastal towns and their crossings.TromsNordlandTrøndelagMøreVestlandOsloBergenÅlesundHarstadStavangerSteinkjerSandefjordArendalBodø
6,100,000 passengers 34 routes 21 vessels Bergen, Norway January–June 2026 (H1)
01 · Scale

Key figures at a glance

The numbers behind a half year on the coast. Every figure below is derived from the route and fleet data in this edition.

6,100,000pax

Carried across 34 routes in the reporting half year — up roughly 6% on the same period last year, on comparable geography.

100%
Network share when a route is selected
179412
Passengers per route (avg)
91.4%
On time, 2026
5/ 21
Electric & hydrogen vessels
1,180
Employees
214
Daily departures
17%
EBITDA margin, 2026
0.030917 kg
CO₂ per passenger-km
02 · Network

The coastal network

Tap a route on the map or in the table to see it reflected across the report. The nine labelled ports are the main hubs; the arcs are the crossings.

Interactive route map of the Norlys Kystlinjen networkStylised Norwegian coastline with 34 ferry routes between coastal towns and their crossings.TromsNordlandTrøndelagMøreVestlandOsloBergenÅlesundHarstadStavangerSteinkjerSandefjordArendalBodø
  • All routes
  • Regions

  • Oslofjord 1
  • Vestland 3
  • Møre 6
  • Troms 4
  • Rogaland 4
  • Trøndelag 2
  • Vestfold 7
  • Agder 6
  • Nordland 1
  • Selected route
  • Main hub

Select a route to see its half-year figures.

RouteRegionH1 passengersSharePassenger-km
Oslo–Fjorden Oslofjord 858,055 14.1% 3,603,831
Bergen–Haukeland Vestland 460,230 7.5% 10,125,060
Ålesund–Værøy Møre 237,916 3.9% 11,419,968
Tromøya–Straumen Troms 171,612 2.8% 1,115,478
Stavanger–Karmøy Rogaland 374,425 6.1% 4,493,100
Trondheimsfjorden Trøndelag 343,223 5.6% 6,349,626
Fredrikstad–Hurøy Vestfold 152,109 2.5% 3,954,834
Larvik–Kristiansand Agder 276,918 4.5% 26,307,210
Sandefjord–Horten Vestfold 257,418 4.2% 2,059,344
Risør–Drangedal Agder 109,207 1.8% 1,528,898
Mandal–Bokn Agder 85,805 1.4% 2,402,540
Haugesund–Karmøy Rogaland 226,215 3.7% 2,035,935
Molde–Værøy Møre 120,908 2.0% 7,496,296
Kristiansund–Hitra Møre 191,113 3.1% 2,102,243
Ålesund–Søvåg Møre 101,407 1.7% 2,028,140
Nordvik–Skjervøy Troms 70,204 1.2% 631,836
Bodø–Vesterålen Nordland 210,614 3.5% 7,160,876
Harstad–Rombak Troms 93,606 1.5% 702,045
Levanger–Sørtrømmen Trøndelag 81,905 1.3% 819,050
Tønsberg–Urhagen Vestfold 128,708 2.1% 643,540
Arendal–Grimstad Agder 183,312 3.0% 3,666,240
Egersund–Hå Rogaland 78,006 1.3% 1,170,090
Florø–Fjørå Vestland 74,105 1.2% 1,333,890
Solund–Sørland Møre 54,603 0.9% 1,310,472
Sogndal–Fjærland Vestland 117,007 1.9% 3,510,210
Ålesund–Tingvoll Møre 105,307 1.7% 1,684,912
Kristiansand–Farsund Agder 97,506 1.6% 1,170,072
Sandnes–Strand Rogaland 66,305 1.1% 629,898
Larvik–Norra Vestfold 140,408 2.3% 982,856
Drøbak–Færder Vestfold 159,911 2.6% 959,466
Horten–Langesund Vestfold 117,007 1.9% 1,287,077
Skien–Porsgrunn Vestfold 202,814 3.3% 1,216,884
Grimstad–Mørkesundet Agder 62,405 1.0% 499,240
Kvæfjord–Tromsø Troms 89,706 1.5% 3,588,240
03 · Fleet

Twenty-one vessels

Ferry, fast-boat and ice-reinforced coastal units. Filter by fuel type and sort on any numeric column.

Fuel type
Sort

21 vessels · filter and sort below

NameBuiltLengthCapacityFuelRoute assignedBerths
Nordlys 2023 98.4 1,200 electric Oslo–Fjorden 300
Kystsol 2022 104.2 1,450 electric Bergen–Haukeland 420
Fjordvak 2019 89.6 860 hybrid Ålesund–Værøy 210
Nordstjerne 2021 76.0 640 hybrid Tromøya–Straumen 150
Havbraam 2016 92.1 940 diesel Stavanger–Karmøy 260
Trondelag 2012 110.5 1,600 diesel Trondheimsfjorden 480
Skagerrak 2018 96.8 1,080 lng Fredrikstad–Hurøy 300
Vestfold 2015 84.3 720 diesel Larvik–Kristiansand 190
Torsk 2024 70.5 480 electric Sandefjord–Horten 120
Isfjord 2020 88.0 800 hybrid Risør–Drangedal 200
Karmsund 2017 94.4 980 diesel Haugesund–Karmøy 270
Kystkonge 2010 116.0 1,750 diesel Molde–Værøy 520
Hitrafarn 2025 66.2 380 fuel-cell Kristiansund–Hitra 90
Sunnfjord 2014 90.0 900 diesel Ålesund–Søvåg 250
Arctic Dawn 2023 102.6 1,150 lng Nordvik–Skjervøy 340
Vesteraring 2019 91.3 960 diesel Bodø–Vesterålen 280
Rombaksfjord 2011 82.7 700 diesel Harstad–Rombak 180
Fosen 2016 95.9 1,010 diesel Levanger–Sørtrømmen 300
Gullsjom 2022 74.8 560 electric Tønsberg–Urhagen 140
Arendalsfart 2009 88.5 880 diesel Arendal–Grimstad 240
Kystvokter 2018 99.0 1,040 diesel Skien–Porsgrunn 300
100 m
Nordlys · 2023
Nordlys
Electric · 2023
Kystkonge · 2010
Kystkonge
Diesel · 2010
Hitrafarn · 2025
Hitrafarn
Hydrogen · 2025
04 · Financials

Financial performance

Figures in NOK million, with two comparison years. All charts are drawn to hand-computed scales; the real figures sit in the tables beneath each chart.

Revenue and EBITDA 2024–2026, NOK million.
0T2T4T6T4,9807205,2408125,510943202420252026
RevenueEBITDA
Revenue and EBITDA, NOK million
YearRevenueEBITDAEBITDA margin
20244,98072014%
20255,24081215%
20265,51094317%
EBITDA waterfall bridge from 720 to 943 NOK million, 2024 to 2026.
+720+150+80-7+9432024 baseVolume & faresOperating efficiencyFuel & energy2026
GainsDragsBase & final
EBITDA bridge 2024 to 2026, NOK million
StepEffect
Volume & fares+150
Operating efficiency+80
Fuel & energy-7
2026+0
Total change+223
CO2 per passenger-kilometre 2024 to 2026 showing a falling trend.
0.0240.0300.0360.0420.0420.0360.031202420252026
Actual CO₂ intensityUncertainty bandTarget 0.024
CO₂ intensity, kg per passenger-km
YearCO₂/passenger-km
20240.041803
20250.036115
20260.030917
05 · Responsibility

Sustainability

Operational CO₂ falls with the share of electric and hydrogen service. The small-multiples grid shows first-half traffic by region.

Operational emissions split by fuel type.
Diesel4,620tLng1,120tHybrid1,080tElectric320tHydrogen280t
Operational CO₂ emissions by fuel type, tonnes
FuelTonnes CO₂Ships
Diesel4,62011
Lng1,1202
Hybrid1,0803
Electric3204
Hydrogen2801
Oslofjord · 1 route
0.86m
Vestland · 3 routes
0.65m
Møre · 6 routes
0.81m
Troms · 4 routes
0.43m
Rogaland · 4 routes
0.74m
Trøndelag · 2 routes
0.43m
Vestfold · 7 routes
1.16m
Agder · 6 routes
0.82m
Nordland · 1 route
0.21m
0.030917 kg
CO₂/passenger-km, 2026
−15%
vs. 2024 intensity
7,420 t
Fleet emissions, 2026

Methodology & scope. Operational emissions measured from fuel and electricity invoices at point of consumption. Passenger-kilometres use scheduled crossing distance times recorded ticket sales, adjusted to a standard 62% load factor. Verified externally by Fjord Grønnsjø AS, ISO 14064-1.

  1. Carbon intensity is measured in kilograms of CO₂ per loaded passenger-kilometre, using scheduled crossing distance and recorded ticket sales adjusted to a standard 62% load factor. back
  2. Operational emissions are measured from fuel and electricity invoices at point of consumption and externally verified under ISO 14064-1. back

What these numbers exclude.

  • Embodied carbon from ship construction and hull steel
  • Crew commuting and corporate office energy
  • Port shore-power electricity distribution losses
  • Non-CO2 high-altitude radiative effects from long-haul connections

06 · Governance

Board & governance

Seven members: three independent directors, two deputy chairs and two employee representatives. Directory stays legible at 320 px.

ED
Einar Dahl
Chairman
Former county transport director
AB
Astrid Bjørnstad
Deputy Chair
Shipping financier
KV
Knut Viken
Independent director
Logistics, rail
MS
Margrethe Solheim
Independent director
Climate policy
BK
Bjarne Kvisli
Independent director
Cyber & risk
OH
Ole Håland
Employee representative
Chief pilot
SR
Solveig Randø
Employee representative
Deck officer
The Board confirms that the financial statements give a true and balanced view of the operator's position at the end of the half year. We reviewed the safety record, the routing of capital toward electric and hydrogen vessels, and the adequacy of the resilience plan against worsening sea states. We support management's stated trajectory on carbon intensity and note the independent verification referenced in the sustainability section. The Board also confirmed the continuity of service obligations to the smallest coastal communities, which are not a line item but the reason the network exists.
07 · Letter

From the CEO

Ingrid Sølvberg · Chief Executive Officer

Dear friends of the coast,

This year the sea, which has always been our road, asked us to be more careful with it. In the first six months we carried 6.1 million passengers across 34 routes, and behind that number is a great many departures that were on time, boarding that was calm, and fjords that were still worth crossing.

The shift is real, not written on a poster. Two of our newest vessels entered service on the busiest crossings, running on electricity drawn from a grid already mostly water. The result is a cut in carbon intensity of roughly eight percent per passenger kilometre since 2024. We are still a diesel-adjacent fleet in parts, and we will not pretend the hard cases are solved: the long northern routes will need a different kind of engine for a while longer.

We grew revenue while holding fares close to the regional averages set by the authorities, which means we earned the extra crown, we did not simply pay more for it. EBITDA rose, and we kept spending on the ships that keep the interior connected to the harbour.

Thank the crews. A schedule is only as reliable as the people who keep it in wind. In the months that follow we will publish, with the same care, how well we keep our promises when the winter returns. Safe travels,

Ingrid Sølvberg, CEO

With care for the coast,Ingrid Sølvberg

  1. Carbon intensity is measured in kilograms of CO₂ per loaded passenger-kilometre, using scheduled crossing distance and recorded ticket sales adjusted to a standard 62% load factor. back
  2. Battery-electric service is viable where crossings are short and frequent. The longest northern crossings still exceed the energy density of available battery and hydrogen systems. back